The Xometry app works best with JavaScript enabled!
Resources3D Printing DesignPolyJet vs. SLA: Differences and Comparison

PolyJet vs. SLA: Differences and Comparison

picture of Kat de Naoum
Written by
Rebecca Piccoli headshot
Updated by
 9 min read
Published July 15, 2022
Updated November 19, 2025

The differences between these two 3D printing methods

Multi material polyjet 3D printing services

These two traditional methods have a lot in common. For example, they’re both additive manufacturing processes that use UV light to cure a liquid resin. They also both print layer by layer, albeit with some differences in the way they do so. So how exactly do they differ, and when would you use either one? Let’s find out.

PolyJet Definition and Comparison to SLA

First developed by Objet-Geometries in 2000, PolyJet 3D printers work quite similarly to inkjet printers. But, instead of depositing drops of liquid ink, PolyJet works by releasing drops of photopolymer, one layer at a time, until it builds a whole 3D model. As it’s being built, UV light cures and solidifies each layer. This type of printer uses multiple heads that work at the same time to lay down the material as well as any support material, which can later be removed by water jetting. If the support material is too thick, it might need some more post-processing like using a chemical bath, peeling, and washing off. These printers can actually print materials other than resin, too, and they can tackle rather large production volumes. But they can’t really make large-format parts. Here’s an image of some parts being printed in a PolyJet printer here at Xometry:

polyjet parts in a machine
Color PolyJet parts being printed at Xometry

PolyJet printing has further advantages, too. For instance, it supports lots of different colors, and its parts have very good tensile strength. It also offers high-resolution parts, and when they’ve been printed, they’re cured well enough, so they won’t need to be placed into a UV oven like SLA parts would (more on this later). Lastly, it’s a very fast way of printing, especially for models that fit within a 5” cube. The one main drawback this technology has, especially over SLA, is that it tends to cost more because the materials are usually more expensive. You can find out more by checking out our guide on the PolyJet process.

What are the Advantages of PolyJet Compared to SLA? 

PolyJet has the following advantages over SLA:

  • PolyJet is more versatile than SLA. It has multi-material and multi-color capabilities. 
  • PolyJet parts have good tensile strength. This process can produce strong, sturdy, durable products. 
  • PolyJet is better in terms of resolution offerings.
  • PolyJet-printed parts are sufficiently cured after printing. SLA, on the other hand, needs a UV oven to fully cure the part. 
  • PolyJet is capable of higher production volumes compared to SLA. 

What are the Disadvantages of PolyJet Compared to SLA? 

A disadvantage of PolyJet over SLA is its more costly materials.

SLA Definition and Comparison to PolyJet

SLA stands for Stereolithography, and it’s the first-ever 3D printing technology to be invented. It was created by Chuck Hull in the 1980s before he went on to found 3D Systems. This type of printer uses a UV laser to trace each layer of a part on the surface of a liquid resin tank. After each layer, the build platform lowers into the tank, exposing the layer to fresh resin so it can harden and bond to the layer before it. When the printing process is finished, the model is cleaned in a chemical bath, the supports are removed by hand, and the part is cured in a UV oven. Sometimes, it will need to be sanded to get it a little smoother. Unlike PolyJet, SLA is much better at making large prototypes and hollow parts because it uses an internal honeycomb structure that makes parts solid and of high quality. That’s another reason why SLA parts are often used in the healthcare and jewelry sectors.

Tags made by Xometry using SLA
Tags made by Xometry using SLA

But, it does have some drawbacks. SLA printers are not as stable as PolyJet printers, which could result in variations between prints, especially if they’re supposed to be the same. Also, they’re not compatible with various materials, and they’re limited to gray, white, and clear color options. The layers these printers can make are usually much thicker, with SLA having a minimum thickness of around 50 microns and PolyJet going down to 16. The last two potential downsides are that SLA parts can be rather brittle and fragile (not great for functional prototypes), and the process can get quite messy—think resin spills, post-processing, and nasty odors.

"PolyJet has the unique capability of blending multiple proprietary PolyJet materials, such as rigid to flexible to colored materials all in the same print job. SLA does not have that capability and only prints from one material at a time."
Matt Schmidt,
Senior Solutions Engineer

What are the Advantages of SLA Compared to PolyJet?

An advantage of SLA over PolyJet is that SLA can print mostly hollow parts using an interior honeycomb structure. 

What are the Disadvantages of SLA compared to PolyJet?

Compared to PolyJet, SLA has the following disadvantages:

  • SLA printers are not as stable as PolyJet printers. This results in variations of duplicate prints. 
  • SLA is not as versatile as PolyJet printers. SLA does not include multi-material capabilities and has limited color options (gray, white, and clear).  
  • SLA layers are thicker than PolyJet, with a minimum layer thickness of roughly 50 microns. PolyJet has a minimum layer thickness of 16 microns. 
  • SLA products are known to be brittle and fragile and are therefore not ideal for functional prototypes.
  • SLA is messy, in terms of resin spills and post-processing processes, and can give off an odor.

Comparison Table Between PolyJet and SLA

We’ve put some attributes side by side to help you directly compare these two processes further:

AttributePolyJetSLA
Attribute
Degrades over time with light and heat exposure
PolyJet
Yes
SLA
Yes
Attribute
Good tensile strength
PolyJet
Yes
SLA
No
Attribute
Accuracy and detail
PolyJet
Small detailed prototypes and intricate patterns
SLA
Large models and intricate patterns
Attribute
Resolution
PolyJet
Excellent - 0.00063”
SLA
Good - 0.005–0.002”
Attribute
Printing speed
PolyJet
Very fast
SLA
Very fast
Attribute
Cost
PolyJet
$6,000 to over $75,000
SLA
$1,200 to over $100,000
Attribute
Surface finish
PolyJet
Smooth right off the build
SLA
Smooth with sanding

PolyJet vs. SLA Attributes Comparisons

Both PolyJet and SLA printers are mainly used for industrial applications. They overlap in terms of pricing. PolyJet prices usually start at around $6,000 and can go past $75,000. SLA, on the other hand, has a wider pricing range that starts at around $1,200 and goes up to $100,000+ for industrial use. SLA is best suited for large models, whereas PolyJet is ideal for small, detailed prototypes. Both SLA and PolyJet printers perform well with intricate patterns and deliver excellent quality products.

PolyJet vs. SLA: Technology Comparison

SLA was the first 3D printing technology and is therefore well-established. PolyJet printers work by spraying droplets of photopolymer, layer upon layer, to form a 3D model on a building tray. A UV light is used to cure the resin. SLA, on the other hand, uses a laser beam to print a 3D model from the resin tank.   

PolyJet vs. SLA: Material Comparison

PolyJet allows for a lot of versatility in terms of material selection. It can print rigid and flexible parts simultaneously in multiple colors. This is a unique feature that sets the PolyJet apart from most 3D printers. SLA, on the other hand, is limited to one material per printed object, with limited colors (gray hues). 

PolyJet vs. SLA: Product Applications Comparison

The selection of either PolyJet or SLA will come down to the end product and its applications. PolyJet is one of the only printer types that allows for multi-color, multi-material printing. It is unmatched in terms of versatility. When printing with comparable materials, SLA performs better in larger prototypes, whereas PolyJet is better for smaller parts with finely detailed printing. 

PolyJet printers are used in various industries including: medical, architecture, dentistry, and automotive. SLA printing, on the other hand, is used in industries such as jewelry, and healthcare. 

PolyJet vs. SLA: Print Volume Comparison

PolyJet has a higher print volume than SLA--it is capable of producing more parts. However, the actual print volumes of both these types of printers are dependent on the model of printer used. In terms of build volume, SLA is capable of larger build volumes, whereas PolyJet is limited to smaller-sized prints. 

PolyJet vs. SLA: Surface Finish Comparison

SLA and PolyJet both produce parts with a smooth surface finish. The difference is that PolyJet-printed parts have a smooth surface right off the build. SLA, on the other hand, requires sanding to achieve a smoother surface finish.

PolyJet vs. SLA: Cost Comparison

PolyJet and SLA are comparable in price. Although SLA has a broader range of available features, and therefore, a wider price range. In terms of material cost, PolyJet materials are typically more expensive due to their superior versatility and more expensive materials that cannot be used with SLA. 

What are the Similarities Between PolyJet and SLA?

PolyJet and SLA share some similarities:

  • Both form part of the 3D printing family called resin-based 3D printing. 
  • Both printers deliver excellent quality end products and are known for their accuracy and detail. 
  • Both SLA and PolyJet printers are used to print intricate details and patterns. 

What are the Other Comparisons for PolyJet Besides SLA?

The following 3D printers compare well with PolyJet 3D printers:

  • PolyJet vs. Multijet: Multijet Printing (MJP) shares the same technology and process as PolyJet. Both use UV lamps to cure liquid photopolymers.

What are the Other Comparisons for SLA Besides PolyJet?

The following is an alternative to  SLA:

  • SLA vs. DLP: Like SLA, DLP (Direct Light Processing) builds parts by curing liquid photopolymer materials. Both technologies produce parts with very high levels of accuracy. 

Frequently Asked Questions on PolyJet and SLA

What are the Mutual Alternatives to the PolyJet and SLA?

Of course; with two being the main ones: FDM and SLS. FDM stands for Fused Deposition Modeling, and it's a material extrusion method that works with plastic, and the parts need support structures, like SLA. It’s also quite similar to PolyJet in that they both use an orthogonal printer transport mechanism for Z-axis layering. SLS, an abbreviation for Selective Laser Sintering, is similar to SLA because they use lasers to fuse material. And like PolyJet, it produces parts with isotropic properties.

What’s the difference between PolyJet and Multijet?

Multijet printing (MJP) is quite similar to PolyJet in that it uses the same technology and process. They both cure liquid photopolymers using UV lamps. The main difference is that multijet uses multiple nozzles for much better precision, and sometimes it even has separate nozzles for support material. We have a guide on the differences between these two, which you can check out.

What’s the difference between SLA and DLP?

DLP stands for Direct Light Processing, and much like SLA, it builds models by curing liquid photopolymer materials. They’re both very accurate. The main difference is that DLP uses a digital light projector to flash an entire layer at once, making it faster for certain prints. You can read our article on SLA vs. DLP to learn more.

How Xometry Can Help

To learn more about PolyJet, SLA, or any related process or material, you can reach out to one of our representatives. Xometry provides lots of services for all your manufacturing, prototyping and production needs, including CNC machining, 3D printing, and laser cutting. Visit our website to learn more, or upload your designs to the Xometry Instant Quoting Engine® and get started straight away.

Disclaimer

The content appearing on this webpage is for informational purposes only. Xometry makes no representation or warranty of any kind, be it expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or validity of the information. Any performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, quality and types of materials, or processes should not be inferred to represent what will be delivered by third-party suppliers or manufacturers through Xometry’s network. Buyers seeking quotes for parts are responsible for defining the specific requirements for those parts. Please refer to our terms and conditions for more information.

picture of Kat de Naoum
Kat de Naoum
Kat de Naoum is a writer, author, editor, and content specialist from the UK with 20+ years of writing experience. Kat has experience writing for a variety of manufacturing and technical organizations and loves the world of engineering. Alongside writing, Kat was a paralegal for almost 10 years, seven of which were in ship finance. She has written for many publications, both print and online. Kat has a BA in English literature and philosophy, and an MA in creative writing from Kingston University.

Read more articles by Kat de Naoum

Support
  • +1-800-983-1959

    support@xometry.com

Mailing Address

© 2025 Xometry, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Legal